[Back] | |
Flexopecten flexuosus versus Fl. glaber | |
Conchological details |
Flexuosus |
Glaber |
||
Lower auricle
The squamous crest is more arched in Flexuosus than in Glaber. The wing is flatter in Glaber. |
|||
Auricular trench
Deeper in Flexuosus. If you compare with the pics above, you will notice that its wall is thinner in Fl. glaber. Click here for more infos. |
|||
Right valve
Each rib has two lateral ridges in Glaber and the furrows of Flexuosus tend to vanish near the margins while they become more and more visible in Glaber. |
|||
Upper
umbonal area
Flexuosus always looks smooth, Glaber sometimes looks cancellated. |
|||
Left valve
Flexuosus is more triangular in shape than Glaber. |
|||
Additional distinctive features | |
Flexopecten flexuosus: 1- The auricular trench is deeper than in glaber, and is prominent in the inner side. 2- The margins smooth out the inner relief of the valves (ribs, undulations). 3- The growth lines are never noticeable. 4- The byssal notch is quadrangular and deep. Flexopecten glaber: 1- Inner furrow sometimes appearing behind the auricular trench, whose wall in thinner than in flexuosus. 2- The inner relief of the valves is more accentuated near the margins than elsewhere. 3- The growth lines can give to the shell a cancellated sculpture near the umbos. 4- The byssal notch is triangular. Some other features seem less useful, and won't be repeated. |
PREVIOUS PAGE |
Many thanks to Carlos Duares de Carvalho (website
here) and Paolo G. Albano (website
here), who gave me pics and shells. Next time we'll try to point out
the differences between a Conus (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Conidae)
and a Patella (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Patellidae). Tricky: both
are conic !
|